Executive summary – what changed and why it matters
In 48 hours, Bending Spoons raised $270 million and acquired AOL, sending its valuation from $2.55B to $11B and shining a spotlight on a resurging “buy, fix and hold” playbook for stagnant SaaS. Firms such as Curious are buying low‑revenue “venture zombies” (companies with $1-5M ARR), cutting costs, centralizing operations and raising prices to push margins to 20-30% – and crucially, holding rather than selling.
- Immediate impact: This validates a financing and operating model that prioritizes steady cash generation over VC‑style exit growth.
- Scale and scope: Targets are typically sub‑$5M ARR assets selling as low as ~1x revenue versus 4x+ for healthy SaaS.
- Operational model: Centralized shared services (sales, marketing, finance) plus cost rationalization and price increases drive rapid margin improvement.
Breaking down the announcement
Bending Spoons’ $270M infusion and the AOL acquisition is the headline – but the substantive shift is market validation. Constellation Software has run this model for decades; newer operators (Tiny, SaaS.group, Arising Ventures, Calm Capital and Curious) are replicating it at software prices that used to be ignored by private equity and secondary buyers. Curious raised $16M of dedicated capital and has acquired five companies, including UserVoice, focusing on businesses that generate $1-5M in recurring revenue.
Why now?
Three forces converge: a long tail of VC‑backed software that no longer attracts follow‑on capital, valuation compression for small SaaS assets, and product disruption from AI‑native entrants that make legacy offerings comparatively less attractive. That creates a supply of “venture zombies” cheap enough to justify hands‑on operational fixes.
How operators monetize these buys — the numbers
Buy multiples can be very low: tech founders and investors say some stalled SaaS assets trade near 1x annual revenue versus 4x+ for healthy peers. With targeted cuts and centralized services, firms report pushing margins to 20–30% quickly. Example: a $1M ARR business moving to 30% margins produces ~$300k EBITDA — cash used to buy more companies or reinvest.
How this differs from private equity and VC
Private equity historically seeks exits and often targets larger revenue profiles; VC prioritizes growth and scale. The buy‑fix‑hold model is operationally intensive like PE but rejects time‑boxed exits — the goal is perpetual cash yield. That can change incentives for product roadmaps, talent retention, and customer pricing.
Risks and governance considerations
- Customer churn and brand damage from aggressive price hikes or degraded product development.
- Concentration risk as centralized platforms accumulate data and operations — privacy and regulatory exposure rises.
- Talent attrition: cost cuts often include headcount reductions that sap product innovation.
- Integration risk: turning a dozen small SaaS into a coherent portfolio requires heavy engineering and operational tooling.
- Valuation risk: if AI makes more legacy products irrelevant, cash flows could decline faster than expected.
Who should care and when to adopt
Founders and small‑fund VCs gain a liquidity path for non‑high‑growth assets. Corporate dev teams and strategic buyers can acquire customer bases and bundles cheaply. But product leaders and operators should adopt only if they can execute centralized ops, retain key customers, and accept lower growth in exchange for stable cash yield. Avoid this approach where network effects, rapid product innovation or category leadership remain attainable.
Recommendations — immediate next steps
- Founders: If you’re sub‑$5M ARR and lack follow‑on capital, explore secondary buyers; negotiate earnouts tied to retention and product investment.
- VCs: Revisit portfolio companies stuck between scale and sale — structured secondary deals can preserve value instead of write‑downs.
- Operators acquiring assets: Prioritize customer churn metrics, product roadmaps, and data‑privacy audits. Model downside scenarios where ARR declines 10–30% post‑integration.
- Product leaders: Prepare a 90‑day retention plan (pricing tests, support uplift, roadmap commitments) to limit churn when integrating an acquired product.
Bottom line: Bending Spoons’ financing and Curious’s activity signals a durable market for disciplined operators willing to trade VC upside for cash generation. The model scales only if teams can execute heavy operational work without destroying customer trust — which is harder than the headlines imply.
Leave a Reply